Bangalore and Heritage

It got me thinking, as I was reading the various posts about preserving Bangalore's heritage landmarks and how we are loosing a lot of the old buildings to the new mall and plaza culture. I can't but notice that people start harping about things only when the axe is to be brought down on it, be it trees or movie theaters of the begone era or the various charming buildings from the old Bangalore. Is just cribbing about the loss enough? Is it not more important that we do something before the crisis occurs and the buildings are forced to be torn down?

Let me take a particular example, Mayo Hall and Galaxy theater. While the former has got a new coat of paint and some renovation and is still earing huge revenues the latter is almost erased from people's memory and from the face of Earth. In today's economic scenario, these landmark buildings NEED to be renovated and made into an economically viable option. This city produces hundreds of top notch management and engineering graduates every year. Could they as citizens along with the owners of these landmark buildings not come up with ways to preserve these buildings and help them generate enough money to keep it standing for the years to come? Does the Government always have to do things? Do the citizens of this city not have any role to play at all except complain of the heritage lost or succumb to the greed?

Every day I pass by the Opera at Residency's and Brigade's junction. I can't help but conjure images in my mind of elegant shows and charming people at this lavish building and the spectators gazing in awe. I guess we will never see such an scene...

A surprise encounter

As usual I was scourging through the Citizen matters webpage when I came across an article about IIWC. This place has been my childhoood haunt and I have quite literally grown up reading and studying in this library. With my mum being the librarian there, this is quite expected I guess. Herez the link to the article: IIWC.

Trees - advertisement

Trees or No trees?

While we all love to claim that having a tree at home and it's advantages, it is often a pain to have random people pelting stones at the Mangoes/Gauvas et al. It becomes even more difficult when one intends to extend the house and axing the trees is such a difficult decision, one goes through a huge emotional trauma to see their favorite tree and child hood companion chopped down.

Looking for people who can design houses incorporating existing trees instead of axing them, any help welcome...